Keith Hopper, Flann O’Brien: A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Post-Modernist, Second edition, Cork, Cork University Press, 2009, 290 p., ISBN 978-1-85918-447-9
1The second edition of this thorough study of Flann O’Brien’s The Third Policeman essentially updates the 1995 edition with additions rather than changes to Keith Hopper’s initial argument. The Third Policeman, Hopper argues, is O’Brien’s masterpiece, and its status as a meta-fiction defines O’Brien as a post-modernist author.
2Hopper starts with a contextual reminder of O’Brien’s difficult position as a writer, in between Yeats’s Celtic Twilight and the subsequent Irish naturalist tradition, on the one hand, and the inhibiting shadow of Joyce on the other hand. The third and fourth chapters of the book deal with character building and frame-breaking strategies as devices in the post-modern metafictional novels of O’Brien. Hopper uses the concept of metalepsis throughout his book to refer to the multiple shifts operated at all levels in O’Brien’s writing: embedded narratives, displaced characters, self-conscious narrators and meta-fictional comments, and finally at the level of language itself.
3Hopper concentrates on The Third Policeman as a menippean satire of Cartesian rationalism, arguing that the use of mock paratext (the so-called footnotes) and the chaotic background of the narrative (distorted space-time continuum, posthumous narration, etc.) “pursue the poetics of nonsense as a means to a satirical end”. For Hopper, the target here is Cartesian rationalism and O’Brien’s satirical deconstruction of rationalist thought partakes of early post-modernism.
4There is added material in Hopper’s discussion of gender and machism in O’Brien’s work, where he points out what he calls O’Brien’s “homosocial” references (women do not feature in his stories and parodic focus is placed on male camaraderie between characters). However, this discussion is inconclusive: was O’Brien criticizing the Irish censorship and conservatism of his time or was he part of it too? This debate seems slightly irrelevant to Hopper’s purpose, but it sheds light on O’Brien’s ambiguity as a satirist.
5Although Hopper offers an overview of O’Brien’s other novels, and mentions his plays and Irish Times chronicles, his book is mostly dedicated to The Third Policeman. It offers an exhaustive reading of the criticism as well as a thorough and convincing interpretation of the novel itself, which had not been done in published form before. However, by focusing exclusively on The Third Policeman, Hopper completely leaves out O’Brien’s chronicles, which he only mentions as biographical or historical documents, thus disregarding their intrinsic literary value. He barely alludes to O’Brien’s bilingualism and thus underplays the importance of An Béal Bocht as a tribute to Gaeltacht autobiographies such as Tomás Ó Criomhthain’s The Islandman. Including O’Brien’s Irish writings would have benefited the study in not reducing Flann O’Brien to his two most famous novels.
Pour citer cet article
Flore Coulouma, « Flann O’Brien », Études irlandaises [En ligne], 34.2 | 2009, mis en ligne le 30 juin 2011, consulté le 29 avril 2017. URL : http://etudesirlandaises.revues.org/1695Haut de page
© Presses universitaires de RennesHaut de page